A Secret Weapon For difference between executive and non executive directors case laws
A Secret Weapon For difference between executive and non executive directors case laws
Blog Article
In addition to the primary punishment, the court may also impose a fine over the offender. The fine’s amount is within the discretion on the court and is meant to serve as an additional deterrent.
Because of the recent amendment, the court imposed a more severe sentence than would have been feasible under the previous version with the legislation.
A survey of PACER buyers, conducted in 2021, measured person satisfaction and determined areas for improvement with PACER services. The Administrative Office on the U.S. Courts is using the survey results To guage and prioritize long run changes to PACER services and options.
The convictions and sentences Upheld, as misappropriation was committed in the bank and due to the fact only the appellants were posted in the relevant time .(Criminal Appeal )
Individual researchers working on defined research projects supposed for scholarly work can make use of the connected form (PDF) to request PACER charge exemptions from multiple courts.
The ICAP Staff Service Rules, 2011 were framed because of the respondent/Institute, these rules may not have the operates within a clear legal and regulatory framework on the respondent/Institute. 14. In view of what is discussed over, without touching the merits with the case, the preliminary objection regarding the maintainability from the petition is sustained plus the petition is held to become not maintainable in terms of Article 199 of the Constitution with the reason that non???statutory rules of service cannot be enforced through writ of mandamus in terms of ratio in the judgment passed by the Supreme Court within the case of Pakistan Electric Power Company supra. Read more
seventy three . Const. P. 288/2024 (D.B.) Engro Fertilizers Limited through Asad Shakil Khan V/S Full Bench of NIRC & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur Bearing on the second issue of non-service of grievance notice. Under Section 33 of the Industrial Relations Ac1,2012 (lRA 2012), ifa grievance notice just isn't served, the grievance petition is usually dismissed. This is because service on the grievance notice is often a mandatory need along with a precondition for filing a grievance petition. The regulation demands that a grievance notice be served within the employer before filing a grievance petition. This allows the employer to reply to the grievance and attempt to resolve it amicably. In the event the employer fails to respond or resolve the grievance, the employee can then file a grievance petition with the National Industrial Relations Commission CNIRC) If your organization is transprovincial.
The appellant should have remained vigilant and raised his challenge to your Judgment within time. Read more
On June sixteen, 1999, a lawsuit was filed here on behalf in the boy by a guardian ad litem, against DCFS, the social worker, as well as therapist. A similar lawsuit was also filed on behalf of your Roe’s victimized son by a different guardian advert litem. The defendants petitioned the trial court for the dismissal based on absolute immunity, since they were all performing in their Careers with DCFS.
The regulation of necessity acknowledged and upheld by Pakistan's highest judicial body has proved an honorable protection for military adventure in civil government.it absolutely was the illegal action called law of necessity..
Case law, also known as precedent, forms the foundation on the Pakistani legal system. Understanding relevant judgments and rulings is vital for interpreting statutes and predicting legal outcomes. Free access to those resources democratizes legal knowledge, empowering citizens and advertising and marketing transparency.
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
104 . Const. P. 1832/2019 (D.B.) Muhammad Fakhar ul Hasnain V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It can be well set up now that the provision for proforma promotion isn't alien or unfamiliar for the civil servant service construction but it is already embedded in Fundamental Rule 17, wherein it's lucidly enumerated that the appointing authority may if contented that a civil servant who was entitled for being promoted from a particular date was, for no fault of his have, wrongfully prevented from rendering service to your Federation/ province during the higher post, direct that these civil servant shall be paid the arrears of fork out and allowances of these higher post through proforma promotion or upgradation arising from the antedated fixation of his/her seniority. Read more
14. Inside the light on the position explained higher than, it is actually concluded that a civil servant includes a fundamental right for being promoted even after his retirement by awarding proforma promotion; provided, his right of promotion accrued during his service but could not be regarded as for no fault of his have and In the meantime he retired on attaining the age of superannuation without any shortcoming on his part about deficiency during the duration of service or from the form of inquiry and departmental action was so taken against his right of promotion. Read more